Balancing strict compliance with student usability

Company

TAMM
Publicis Sapient

Product

Government education portal

Year

2019

Role

Product Designer

Over five months as Product Designer at Publicis Sapient, I designed the online education journey for young Emirati students discovering and applying to vocational programs. Working within a client-agency structure where final design decisions sat with the government client's design system team, I focused on building rationale and validation to help the client confidently approve and ship a solution that balanced strict compliance with student usability.

Problem framing

Problem framing

The constraint wasn't just regulatory—it was structural. The client's internal design system team held final decision authority, requiring every design proposal to be thoroughly rationalized and validated before review. With limited client validation cycles and low student awareness of vocational programs, I needed to present work that was both compliant and clearly justified through research.

The challenge: create a compelling, evidence-based case for design decisions within a multi-layered approval structure.

Approach

What are the key challenges to be solved?

1.

Building a stakeholder alignment through a design sprint

I participated in a week-long design sprint that brought together client stakeholders, government representatives, and our agency team. My role was to synthesize research inputs, support rapid prototyping, and help translate insights into actionable design criteria the client team could rally behind. The sprint revealed that students approached vocational search fundamentally differently than traditional education—requiring guided discovery, not just navigation. This insight became the foundation of our design rationale. Delivering a solution within established structure

Delivering a solution within established structure

2.

Validate Concepts to enable client decisions

I designed and conducted A/B tests and interviews with 20 students to generate validation data the client team needed to approve design directions. When research showed tension between compliance requirements and optimal user flows, I prototyped hybrid approaches and presented comparative analysis to help the client evaluate trade-offs. By framing design options through user data rather than opinion, I helped the client team make confident decisions within their regulatory constraints.

I designed and conducted A/B tests and interviews with 20 students to generate validation data the client team needed to approve design directions. When research showed tension between compliance requirements and optimal user flows, I prototyped hybrid approaches and presented comparative analysis to help the client evaluate trade-offs. By framing design options through user data rather than opinion, I helped the client team make confident decisions within their regulatory constraints.

I designed and conducted A/B tests and interviews with 20 students to generate validation data the client team needed to approve design directions. When research showed tension between compliance requirements and optimal user flows, I prototyped hybrid approaches and presented comparative analysis to help the client evaluate trade-offs. By framing design options through user data rather than opinion, I helped the client team make confident decisions within their regulatory constraints.

Outcome & Impact

Launched April 2020 on TAMM platform.
Agency-client collaboration:

  • The validation framework I established helped reduce client review cycles, enabling faster decision-making -

  • Research-backed design rationale gave the client team confidence to approve simplified wording that initially seemed too informal for government standards

  • The approach I used—building evidence-based cases for design decisions—became my standard method for navigating client-agency dynamics

After launch:

  • The journey structure was adopted by the client for 3 other educational features

  • Student support inquiries about "how to search" decreased significantly in first 2 months (reported by client)

  • Qualitative feedback showed students felt more confident discovering relevant programs

Launched April 2020 on TAMM platform.
Agency-client collaboration:

  • The validation framework I established helped reduce client review cycles, enabling faster decision-making -

  • Research-backed design rationale gave the client team confidence to approve simplified wording that initially seemed too informal for government standards

  • The approach I used—building evidence-based cases for design decisions—became my standard method for navigating client-agency dynamics

After launch:

  • The journey structure was adopted by the client for 3 other educational features

  • Student support inquiries about "how to search" decreased significantly in first 2 months (reported by client)

  • Qualitative feedback showed students felt more confident discovering relevant programs

Launched April 2020 on TAMM platform.
Agency-client collaboration:

  • The validation framework I established helped reduce client review cycles, enabling faster decision-making -

  • Research-backed design rationale gave the client team confidence to approve simplified wording that initially seemed too informal for government standards

  • The approach I used—building evidence-based cases for design decisions—became my standard method for navigating client-agency dynamics

After launch:

  • The journey structure was adopted by the client for 3 other educational features

  • Student support inquiries about "how to search" decreased significantly in first 2 months (reported by client)

  • Qualitative feedback showed students felt more confident discovering relevant programs

Unified Search & Guidance

I proposed and validated a dual-path approach (direct search + guided recommendations) that accommodated both goal-directed and exploratory behaviors. User testing data helped convince the client team this approach was necessary despite adding complexity.

Clearer Wording & Visual Guidance

Working closely with a copywriter, I developed wording for both English and Arabic versions that balanced educational terminology with accessible language for 18-24 year old students. This bilingual approach ensured consistency across both languages while respecting cultural context, helping students understand complex program requirements without feeling overwhelmed by institutional jargon.

Ivan Bonin

©2026

Ivan Bonin

©2026

Ivan Bonin

©2026